ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 3:  Tom Sjurstad - NOR

Ranking Index = 15,23
 Glider aerobatic NM 2023, ENKL Klanten, 7.-8. Oktober 2023
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Primary - Glider, 2nd Known Sequence
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Pres No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 Mariann Brattland - NOR 6,0 7,5 8,0 7,0 8,0 6,0 8,0 0 512,69 2 -1
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 5,23 7,65 7,87 7,18 7,87 6,23 8,13   515,33    
2 Erik Hansegaard - NOR 8,0 7,0 7,0 5,0 7,5 6,0 7,0 0 473,65 5 -3
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 7,87 7,18 6,55 5,66 7,21 6,23 7,18   475,15    
3 Arvid Næss - NOR 7,5 7,5 7,0 6,0 7,5 6,0 7,0 0 490,90 4 -1
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 7,21 7,65 6,55 6,23 7,21 6,23 7,18   489,08    
4 Stein Marius Pedersen - NOR 8,0 7,0 7,5 6,0 8,0 6,0 7,0 0 496,48 3 +1
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 7,87 7,18 7,21 6,23 7,87 6,23 7,18   495,80    
5 Kjetil Mathisen - NOR 9,0 8,0 6,0 6,0 7,0 7,0 8,0 0 Hi 519,50 1 +4
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 9,19 8,13 5,23 6,23 6,55 7,18 8,13   487,37    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1   10
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 11 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 3 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies     Ch.Judge   Judge 2   Judge 3
Kjetil Mathisen - NOR   460,05 465,05 Hi 519,50
  DG1001 NEO LN-GDG   487,37
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7,11, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,62 Panel average mark = 7,05, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,84
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Kjetil Mathisen - NOR DG1001 NEO 487,37 Hi  472,39 14,98     1     5     + 4     10,08 66,20%
Erik Hansegaard - NOR DG1001 NEO 475,15 -   496,26 21,11     5     2     - 3     4,14 27,20%
Mariann Brattland - NOR DG1001 NEO 515,33 -   515,25 0,08     2     1     - 1     0,53 3,50%
Arvid Næss - NOR DG1001 NEO 489,08 -   494,44 5,36     4     3     - 1     0,39 2,60%
Stein Marius Pedersen - NOR DG1001 NEO 495,80 -   493,90 1,90     3     4     + 1     0,08 0,50%
                  15,23    
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 5,10

 Min = 0,00 Average = 2,55
Panel:

= 5,10

 = -0,21  = 2,44
 
Most favoured Least favoured Judge Avg NOR x 5 Ranking Index totals per nation Using the +/- rank differences to show national bias from the most to the least favoured teams.

Calculations (incl. W/U) by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 07.10.23