ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 3:  Tom Sjurstad - NOR

Ranking Index = 1,30
 Glider aerobatic NM 2023, ENKL Klanten, 7.-8. Oktober 2023
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Primary - Glider, 1st Known Sequence
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Pres No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 Mariann Brattland - NOR 8,0 7,5 7,5 6,0 7,0 7,0 9,0 0 501,27 2 -1
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 8,02 7,14 7,45 5,77 6,88 6,68 8,50   498,21    
2 Kjetil Mathisen - NOR 8,0 8,0 8,0 6,0 7,5 7,5 8,0 0 511,37 1 +1
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 8,02 7,59 8,02 5,77 7,45 7,14 7,59   507,94    
3 Arvid Næss - NOR 6,0 8,5 7,5 6,0 5,0 6,5 8,0 0 468,06 3
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 5,74 8,05 7,45 5,77 4,61 6,23 7,59   466,29    
4 Stein Marius Pedersen - NOR 8,0 8,5 7,0 2,0 6,0 7,0 6,0 0 422,42 4
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 8,02 8,05 6,88 2,14 5,74 6,68 5,77   422,06    
5 Erik Hansegaard - NOR 7,0 7,0 HZ HZ HZ HZ 8,0 0 231,10 5
    DG1001 NEO LN-GDG 6,88 6,68 CHZ CHZ CHZ CHZ 7,59   238,55    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   2
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 8 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - 1  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

   Judge 3 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7,07, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2,52 Panel average mark = 6,86, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 2,49
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Mariann Brattland - NOR DG1001 NEO 498,21 -   511,07 12,86     2     1     - 1     0,71 54,30%
Kjetil Mathisen - NOR DG1001 NEO 507,94 -   499,03 8,91     1     2     + 1     0,59 45,70%
                  1,30    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Arvid Næss - NOR DG1001 NEO 466,29   473,64 7,35     3     3            
Stein Marius Pedersen - NOR DG1001 NEO 422,06   411,02 11,04     4     4            
Erik Hansegaard - NOR DG1001 NEO 238,55   241,07 2,52     5     5            
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0,00

 Min = -0,11 Average = -0,06
Panel:

= 3,19

 = -1,86  = 0,66
 
Most favoured Least favoured Judge Avg NOR x 5 Ranking Index totals per nation Using the +/- rank differences to show national bias from the most to the least favoured teams.

Calculations (incl. W/U) by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 07.10.23